
Guardianship is the most restrictive solution to the issue of persons with impaired decision-making ability who are at risk of harm. Not only is guardianship involuntary and often stigmatizing - it also removes a person's civil rights. Indeed, because of its restrictive nature the NH guardianship statute states that guardianship is only appropriate if a less restrictive alternative is not available.
The goal of this two-year project is to establish mentorship as a voluntary alternative to guardianship that preserves an individual's autonomy and decision-making rights. The model is based on an alternative to guardianship used in several European countries, in particular Sweden, which has abolished guardianship in favor of a mentor alternative. Mentorship assumes that such persons don't require a guardian so much as they need someone to assist and advise them to make better decisions while retaining their civil rights.
A person will be considered as a candidate to participate if he/she:
If all criteria are met and there is consensus to participate among all parties, a mentor will begin working with a participant (after guardianship has been terminated if one is in place). The mentorship will be evaluated monthly to assess changes in the participant's decision-making abilities and overall quality of life.
Mentors selected for participation will be individuals who are:
Mentors will receive a two-day in-service training after which they will devote an average of 10 hours a month (an average of two hours a week) to the project. Mentors will receive $100 a month.
For more information about the Mentorship Project, including becoming a mentor, please contact:
For information about the Real Choice Systems Change Project please contact: